Difference between revisions of "Talk:Socket 7 Builds"
From Vogons Wiki
(Created page with "The presented VX Pro and TX Pro facts should be removed since they do not contain valuable information. Even the linked Redhill Guide article mentiones that the VX Pro is slow...") |
RacoonRider (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I have boards with both chipsets and I don't have anything to complain about these boards. Lower performance compared to i430VX might be the case for the VX Pro+, i did no direct comparison. | I have boards with both chipsets and I don't have anything to complain about these boards. Lower performance compared to i430VX might be the case for the VX Pro+, i did no direct comparison. | ||
The comparison should be done against another Apollo VPX board.[[User:Enigma|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigma|talk]]) 10:53, 4 April 2013 (EST) | The comparison should be done against another Apollo VPX board.[[User:Enigma|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigma|talk]]) 10:53, 4 April 2013 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is that better? :) | ||
| + | --[[User:RacoonRider|RacoonRider]] ([[User talk:RacoonRider|talk]]) 16:54, 4 April 2013 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 16:54, 4 April 2013
The presented VX Pro and TX Pro facts should be removed since they do not contain valuable information. Even the linked Redhill Guide article mentiones that the VX Pro is slower and that the TX Pro ran quite well even at 75 MHz. Quite a contradiction to whats written here.
TX Pro is btw the SIS5591 chipset and VX Pro+ the Apollo VPX chipset.
I have boards with both chipsets and I don't have anything to complain about these boards. Lower performance compared to i430VX might be the case for the VX Pro+, i did no direct comparison. The comparison should be done against another Apollo VPX board.Enigma (talk) 10:53, 4 April 2013 (EST)
Is that better? :) --RacoonRider (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2013 (EST)
