Storage

Common IDE Categories

Early IDE (ATA-0 & ATA-1)

• IDE for 16bit ISA controllers, connects IDE storage devices directly to the ISA/AT bus
• Few storage devices from this period supported the DMA modes.
• Processors <= 486 are often CPU limited in most applications before they reach theoretical ATA throughput limits
• Most contemporary PATA storage devices are highly compatible with early IDE controllers

EIDE (ATA-3 & ATA-4, UDMA/33 )

• Common between 1993-1998: VLB & PCI 486 boards, Socket 4,5 & 7 Pentiums, Pentium II.
• 80 connector IDE cables recommended but not required for these devices
• Most systems show a noticeable performance improvement when multiword IO and DMA modes are enabled
• DOS requires a UDMA compatible BIOS or UDMA drivers in config.sys to take advantage of the advanced transfer modes.

Mature PATA (ATA-6 and newer: Ultra ATA-66, ATA-100 & ATA-133)

• Common between 1999-2010: Pentium 3 & Athlon through Core2
• 80 connector IDE cables required to negotiate 66Mhz speeds or higher.
• 80 connector IDE cables can be simulated by grounding Pin #34 for devices with a 40 pin female connector that do not use a cable
• UDMA modes offer a significant increase in performance over PIO modes in most cases.
• Storage devices show a small performance increase when using ATA-133 over ATA-66
• Storage devices show a small performance increase when using IHA (Intel Hub Architecture) or Vlink attached controllers over a PCI attached controller
• DOS requires a UDMA compatible BIOS or UDMA drivers in config.sys to take advantage of the advanced transfer modes.

More information about PATA ATA is available here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_ATA

SATA

• Common after 2004
• Early SATA devices were often PATA devices with a SATA bridge
• Bridges are commonly available today to connect PATA devices to SATA controllers & vice versa.
• Sata Connector / mSata Connector / M2 Sata connector (NGFF)

NVMe

• Common after 2018, no longer uses ATA protocols
• Uses the same M2 connector as NGFF Sata, but with different notches
• Connects storage directly to PCI-E

Common BIOS Storage Limitations

• July 1994 - 504/528 MB limit - Original CHS (Cylinders/Heads/Sectors) limit - BIOS before this date rarely support drives over 528MB. As released, these systems were limited to 1024 Cylinders, 16 Heads, 63 Sectors/Track. These systems either don't allow larger values to be entered, or were not stable when larger values are configured.
• May 1996 - 2015 MB limit - INT 13h limit - Some BIOS before this date allow drives up to 2015 MB by updating INT 13h to allow Cylinder values up to 4095. Head limit remained at 16, Sectors/Track at 63. Not supported by Microsoft Operating Systems before Win95 SR2.
• Phoenix BIOS 4.03 and 4.04 - 3277 MB limit - The BIOS config screen locks if a drive is configured with a capacity over 3277 MB.
• February 1997
  • 4.2 GB limit - ECHS limit (Extended CHS) - Some BIOS before this date allow a 'Large' mode in the BIOS that produces an alternate geometry by doubling the number of heads and halving the number of cylinders shown to DOS until cylinders <= 1024. The limit for this method for drives that report 16 heads is 4032 MB (C=1024, H = 128, S = 63).
  • 7.9 GB limit - Revised ECHS limit. Other BIOS from this period have a 'Large' mode in the BIOS that presents an alternate geometry using multiples of 15 heads, up to 240 heads. This method stops working at 7560 MB (C=1024, H=240, S=63)
  • 8.4 GB limit - Final ECHS limit - BIOS geometry uses head value from the sequence 16, 32, 64, 128, 255 to present an alternate geometry up to 8.4 GB (C=1024, H=255, S=63).
• August 1999 - 33.8 GB limit - BIOS before this date often stored the cylinders as a 16 bit value, so they may have issues when a drive reports cylinders > 65535. Drives from this era often had a jumper to limit cylinders = 65535.
• September 2001 - 137.4 GB limit - BIOS before this date only used ATA-5, which used 28 bits to identify each LBA sector, limiting drive capacity to 137GB. ATA-6 added an additional 48bit LBA sector field.
• Hard drives that report a CHS geometry of 16383 Cylinders, 16 Heads and 63 Sectors/Track are indicating that they are larger than ECHS geometry translation allows and that LBA or LBA48 should be used
• Hard drives that report an LBA capacity of 0xfffffff are indicating that they are larger than LBA allows and that LBA48 should be used
• Number of Heads had a limit of 255 in MS-DOS so no BIOS was ever enhanced to allow more than 255 Heads.
• Sectors/Track was limited to 63 in early BIOS and was never addressed because increasing the number of allowable Cylinders & switching to LBA fixed most storage issues.

Overcoming Limitations and Incompatibilities

• Systems with BIOS limitations can be configured to work with larger drives using one of these three techniques:
  • Configure the drive with geometry with Cylinders < 1024, Heads <= 16, and Sectors <= 63 in the BIOS and install drive overlay software that replaces the BIOS routines when the boot sector is loaded
  • Upgrade your BIOS using a new BIOS from the motherboard manufacturer or from a third party such as MR BIOS that works with your motherboard
  • Install an add-in card with an option ROM extension that replaces the BIOS disk routines before BOOT such as XTIDE UniversalBIOS or SIIG Enhanced BIOS
• Drive overlay software is usually the easiest option
• "EZ Drive" overlay software usually works with partition types and drive geometries that are compatible with modern operating systems. This can be helpful if you plan to move storage devices between computers.
• Early LBA drives do not always work correctly with mature LBA controllers. This can be resolved by configuring the drive mode as 'CHS' or 'Normal' in the BIOS.
• Mature ATA6 storage devices may have trouble negotiating a compatible configuration with some early ATA-3 & ATA-4 controllers. This can be resolved by disabling ATA33 or UDMA modes in the BIOS.
• PATA speeds faster than UDMA2 (such as ATA-5, Ultra ATA/66, UDMA3, UDMA/66) require a ground or open circuit on IDE pin #34. Usually this can be done with an 80 wire IDE cable, but can also be accomplished by grounding or removing pin #34.

Common OS Storage Limitations

• Microsoft DOS (including Windows 95/98) require heads <= 255
• Full support for enhanced INT 13h (Cylinders >= 1024 / disks larger than 8.4GB) arrived with these releases:
  • Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2
  • Windows 2000
  • IBM OS/2 Warp Client version 4.0.14.
  • LILO version 21.4
• Windows 98 require a patch for LBA48 support and is limited to 137.4GB LBA drives without it.
• Linux kernels older than 2.0.39 / 2.2.14 / 2.3.21 require a patch to work with cylinders > 65535.
• Microsoft Operating Systems up through Windows 7 & Server 2008r2 use CHS addressing when booting from a master boot record

Common File System / Partitioning Limitations

• DOS with FAT12 allowed for 32MB partitions using the largest cluster size
• DOS with FAT16B allowed for 2GB partitions with the default cluster size
• DOS/Win with FAT32 allowed for 2TB partitions with the default cluster size

Modern Storage for Retro Computers

CF (Compact Flash)

A popular portable storage format developed in 1994 that is compatible with IDE signaling and ATA protocols. Standard has not significantly changed since PATA matured.

Pros

• Still very common
• Contains a PATA controller, so most adpters are inexpensive pass though adapters
• Very easy to transport between old and new systems
• Rugged form factor that is difficult to damage

Cons

• Devices have been made for a long by many different companies so there is a wide spectrum of performance between the best and worst devices
• Some CF devices are optimised for storing a few large files and perform slower than expected on rapid small file access
• Rare CF devices have issues negotiating ATA protocols with early ATA-2 and ATA-3 controllers
• Rare CF devices require 3.3v power, which requires an adapter with a voltage regulator
• CF is slowly becoming obsolete.

SD to IDE Adapters:

Pros

• SD devices are a very common and affordable storage media
• Usually provides good response on application style work loads (small reads and writes)
• Easy to transport between old and new systems

Cons

• The most popular adapter (Sintechi) is limitted to High Speed SD (25MB/s) regardless of your SD device's capabilities, which can be limitting on computers using ATA-4 and faster IDE controllers.
• The most popular adapter (Sintechi) has issues negotiating ATA protocols with some early ATA-2 and ATA-3 controllers
• Old & low quality SD devices can limit performance
• Micro SD cards can be easy to lose or damage

Disk on Module (Dom):

Pros

• Does not require an adapter or cable, sits right on the IDE block for a less cluttered case
• Most DOM devices offer performance on par with the best SD and CF devices

Cons

• Hardware mod (short pin 34) or Female-Female 40 pin cable necessary to negotiate speeds faster that ATA-4 / UDMA2
• Some DOM devices have issues negotiating ATA protocols with early ATA-2 and ATA-3 controllers
• DOM devices usually have ide latches that firmly connect to the IDE pin-blocks. These latches can stress brittle plastic on old motherboards
• Difficult to connect to a new PC without a Female-Female 40 pin cross over cable

Sata SSD:

Pros

• Best performance, especially when the device has a write buffer
• Usually supports TRIM and wear leveling
• In 2021, NGFF and M2 devices have affordable pricing for builds between 16GB and 64GB
• Usually responds well to an ATA Secure erase command to reset wear leveling

Cons

• You may need one or more adapters if you want to connect your device to a 40 pin IDE controller
• More convenient to move between systems than a DOM, but not as easy as SD and CF
• Sata --> Pata converters usually require Sata 1 protocols and some recent Sata devices lack full Sata 1 support. (e.g. PNY)

Write Amplification and wear leveling:

• It isn't clear how well CF, SD, and DOM devices handle wear leveling without doing a lot of research on your specific device
• Very few, if any of these devices support trim commands, but since operating systems before < Windows 7 don't support it either, it usually doesn't matter
• Purchasing a device that is 100% larger than your storage requirement is often an effective way of preventing write amplication related performance issues
• For Win98, consider adding "ConservativeSwapfileUsage=1" to your system.ini to reduce unnecessary swap file usage if you have > 16MB ram
• For WinXP, consider adding extra ram to reduce swap file usage
• It isn't clear how any of these devices will respond to an ATA Secure erase command to reset the device's wear leveling

Removable Storage Speed Ratings

CF Revisions

• CompactFlash 1.0 (1995) supported PIO2 with capacity up to 137 GB.
• CompactFlash 2.0 (2003) added PIO4 followed by DMA 33 in mid-2004.
• CompactFlash 3.0 (2004) added UDMA 66 (UDMA3)
• CompactFlash 4.0 (2006) added IDE Ultra DMA Mode 6 and UDMA 133
• CompactFlash 5.0 (2010) added LBA 48 for drives larger than 137 GB
• CompactFlash 6.0 (November 2010) added UltraDMA Mode 7 (167 MByte/s), ATA-8/ACS-2 sanitize command, and TRIM support
• CFast (2008) Also called CompactFast, is a SATA based standard with a similar form factor that is not interchangeable with PATA CF devices
• XQD card (2011) Is a PCI-E based standard with a similar form factor than is not compatible with either PATA CF or SATA CFast

SD Speed Ratings

Early SD speed classes only measured minimum write throughput, which does not align with usual computing work loads.

Comparison of SD card Speed Class ratings

Minimum sequential writing speed		Speed Class
	Suggested max. bitrate	Speed Class	UHS Speed Class	Video Speed Class
2 MB/s	15 Mbit/s	Class 2 (C2)	N/A	N/A
4 MB/s	30 Mbit/s	Class 4 (C4)	N/A	N/A
6 MB/s	45 Mbit/s	Class 6 (C6)	N/A	Class 6 (V6)
10 MB/s	75 Mbit/s	Class 10 (C10)	Class 1 (U1)	Class 10 (V10)
30 MB/s	220 Mbit/s		Class 3 (U3)	Class 30 (V30)
60 MB/s	460 Mbit/s			Class 60 (V60)
90 MB/s	700 Mbit/s			Class 90 (V90)

Application Performance Class is defined in SD Specification 5.1 and 6.0 which mandates a minimum IOPS for reading and writing, which more closely aligns with computing work loads.

Comparison of SD card Application Performance Class ratings

Name	Minimum random IOPS		Minimum sustained sequential writing
	Read	Write
Application Performance Class 1 (A1)	1500 IOPS	500 IOPS	10 MB/s
Application Performance Class 2 (A2)	4000 IOPS	2000 IOPS