Difference between revisions of "Talk:NVIDIA"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Also, shouldn't Se'''r'''a Saturn be Se'''g'''a Saturn? | Also, shouldn't Se'''r'''a Saturn be Se'''g'''a Saturn? | ||
| + | |||
| + | The GF4 MX 460 is missing in the GF2 section. Also the performance of the GF4 MX 460 is between a GF3 Ti200 and Ti500, at least according to these benchmarks [http://www.anandtech.com/show/875/11 Anandtech GF2 GF3 GF4 benches]. | ||
| + | So the "significant win" mentioned in the GF3 is not true. It should be considered that the GF4 MX series has LMA2 while the GF3 only has LMA1.[[User:Enigma|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigma|talk]]) 16:12, 23 February 2013 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 16:12, 23 February 2013
I added a picture of a GeForce 3, but I'm not happy with the result of how the picture interferes with the written part of the article. I tried adding 2 more lines to the bottom of the GF3 and GF4 article to make it fit, but the extra lines won't show up on the page itself. Also, the image is a bit larger then the rest of the pictures. How to I make the thumbnail smaller? (Edit:Fixed it!)
Also, shouldn't Sera Saturn be Sega Saturn?
The GF4 MX 460 is missing in the GF2 section. Also the performance of the GF4 MX 460 is between a GF3 Ti200 and Ti500, at least according to these benchmarks Anandtech GF2 GF3 GF4 benches. So the "significant win" mentioned in the GF3 is not true. It should be considered that the GF4 MX series has LMA2 while the GF3 only has LMA1.Enigma (talk) 16:12, 23 February 2013 (EST)
