Difference between revisions of "Talk:Windows 9x Builds"
From Vogons Wiki
D1stortion (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:theoretically in terms of about any Win95 game other than Minesweeper though ;) but ok not the best wording [[User:D1stortion|D1stortion]] ([[User talk:D1stortion|talk]]) 13:12, 21 February 2013 (EST) | :theoretically in terms of about any Win95 game other than Minesweeper though ;) but ok not the best wording [[User:D1stortion|D1stortion]] ([[User talk:D1stortion|talk]]) 13:12, 21 February 2013 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == ATI == | ||
| + | Can the Rage 128 be an exception to the "No ATI" rule? It has a Paletted textures option available in the drivers' control panel but warns not to always have this on, and only use it when necessary. -[[User:Leilei|Leilei]] ([[User talk:Leilei|talk]]) 10:55, 4 March 2013 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:55, 4 March 2013
Running Windows 95 is not just "theoretically" on a 386 since I have such a system running. e.g. Windows 98 requires a 486 (DX66 recommended). Enigma (talk) 13:08, 21 February 2013 (EST)
- theoretically in terms of about any Win95 game other than Minesweeper though ;) but ok not the best wording D1stortion (talk) 13:12, 21 February 2013 (EST)
ATI
Can the Rage 128 be an exception to the "No ATI" rule? It has a Paletted textures option available in the drivers' control panel but warns not to always have this on, and only use it when necessary. -Leilei (talk) 10:55, 4 March 2013 (EST)
